Hi I have a problem with a LookUp. It gives me an error for the "_" for the end of the line.
The mcu is a 12f629
Thank you
table:
Duty = LookUp index,[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5,6,6,7,7,7,8,_
8,9,9,10,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15,16,17,17,18,18,19,19,20,21,21,22,23,23,24,24,25,26,26,_
27,28,29,29,30,31,31,32,33,34,34,35,36,37,37,38,39,40,40,41,42,43,44,45,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,51,52,53,_
54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,_
88,89,90,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,101,102,103,104,105,107,108,109,110,111,113,114,115,116,117,119,120,_
121,122,124,125,126,127,129,130,131,133,134,135,137,138,139,141,142,143,145,146,147,149,150,151,153,_
154,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,167,168,170,171,173,174,175,177,178,180,181,183,184,186,187,189,_
190,192,193,195,196,198,199,201,203,204,206,207,209,210,212,213,215,217,218,220,221,223,225,226,_
228,230,231,233,234,236,236,239,241,243,244,246,248,249,251,253,255]
Return
Strange. The manual says that you can omit the underline for certain commands, LookUp being one of them but it doesn't then see the second and subsequent lines. I think this is one for Les.
Charlie
That is strange. I compiled the code for a 18F25K20 (Amicus board) without the line extension _ character and it appears to have correctly created the data table with all 255 bytes.
John
; USER. LOOKUP AND LOOKDOWN TABLE DATA
_lelb__1
db 0,0,0,0
db 0,0,0,0
db 0,1,1,1
db 1,1,2,2
db 2,2,3,3
db 3,3,4,4
db 4,5,5,5
db 6,6,7,7
db 7,8,8,9
db 9,10,10,10
db 11,11,12,12
db 13,13,14,14
db 15,15,16,17
db 17,18,18,19
db 19,20,21,21
db 22,23,23,24
db 24,25,26,26
db 27,28,29,29
db 30,31,31,32
db 33,34,34,35
db 36,37,37,38
db 39,40,40,41
db 42,43,44,45
db 45,46,47,48
db 49,50,51,51
db 52,53,54,55
db 56,57,58,59
db 60,61,62,62
db 63,64,65,66
db 67,68,69,70
db 71,72,73,74
db 75,76,77,79
db 80,81,82,83
db 84,85,86,87
db 88,89,90,92
db 93,94,95,96
db 97,98,99,101
db 102,103,104,105
db 107,108,109,110
db 111,113,114,115
db 116,117,119,120
db 121,122,124,125
db 126,127,129,130
db 131,133,134,135
db 137,138,139,141
db 142,143,145,146
db 147,149,150,151
db 153,154,156,157
db 158,160,161,163
db 164,165,167,168
db 170,171,173,174
db 175,177,178,180
db 181,183,184,186
db 187,189,190,192
db 193,195,196,198
db 199,201,203,204
db 206,207,209,210
db 212,213,215,217
db 218,220,221,223
db 225,226,228,230
db 231,233,234,236
db 236,239,241,243
db 244,246,248,249
db 251,253,255
This is a bit of an anomaly. It should have recognised the ',_' and the ',' as the line extension. However, it appears that some are not recognising the ',_' anymore, but do recognise the ','. I'll look into it ASAP.
I am trying to get rid of the ',_' in the compiler's syntax and just make it a ',' and that is why I had it recognising both for backward compatability, but something has gone wrong somewhere in some commands.
Duty = LookUp Index,[0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5,6,6,7,7,7,8,
8,9,9,10,10,10,11,11,12,12,13,13,14,14,15,15,16,17,17,18,18,19,19,20,21,21,22,23,23,24,24,25,26,26,
27,28,29,29,30,31,31,32,33,34,34,35,36,37,37,38,39,40,40,41,42,43,44,45,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,51,52,53,
54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,
88,89,90,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,101,102,103,104,105,107,108,109,110,111,113,114,115,116,117,119,120,
121,122,124,125,126,127,129,130,131,133,134,135,137,138,139,141,142,143,145,146,147,149,150,151,153,
154,156,157,158,160,161,163,164,165,167,168,170,171,173,174,175,177,178,180,181,183,184,186,187,189,
190,192,193,195,196,198,199,201,203,204,206,207,209,210,212,213,215,217,218,220,221,223,225,226,
228,230,231,233,234,236,236,239,241,243,244,246,248,249,251,253,255]
Works fine.
Thanks everyone I removed "_" and it compiles without problems
In most of the languages the line continuation is guarantee when it's enclosed within parenthesis. But like C & Co., there's the \ symbol as line join, which is becoming less used.
The languages are evolving, spoken one too, so it's natural this changes may be breaking the backward compatibilities.